Secondly we ask you all to read the whole website, or at least the whole manifest even if you think it is the worst idea you ever heard of or on the contrary, the most pulverized idea you know. You might get new perspectives and new ideas.
The worst thing that can happen is a waste of a few hours. The best thing is the end of all suffer.

It is very hard for us to explain a concept that has become the primal thought, in fact the only thought in our lives. You of all people know it is not easy to explain your most fundamental perceptions and ideas. It is too clear, too obvious, too simple and right, that ironically it is hard to pass it forth. Yet this is the goal of this manifest. An explanation why the only deep-rooted, fundamental, radical, comprehensive, and true solution to the world’s suffer, is to destroy it. Or at least cease our own existence as a species.
To annihilate the human race, as you all know, is to eliminate about 99% of the suffer.

It might sound and look like a human hate parade. It is not. We are not promoting the annihilation idea out of hate. Not out of rage or despair. We only interested in stopping the suffer, not in revenge. It is not an impulsive reaction. It is a rational idea. The only rational idea, under the circumstances. The only moral thing to do.

This manifest was sent to the most radical animal rights and liberation organizations in the world (we hope). We see you all as the potential rescuers, the only chance the sufferers have. If you know more people that care enough and brave enough to do whatever it takes to help the animals, please make sure they get it.

For all too many, life is a continuous struggle against violence, density, a deformed body, diseases, filth, fear and pain. Most of the creatures suffer most of the time. What wouldn’t you give to stop all the suffer in the world?
Well apparently it’s not about giving. It is about taking. Taking the humans’ lives. All the humans’ lives. As soon as possible.

Don’t let the animals wait for the sun to turn off or a meteorite to hit earth. Who knows when and if it will ever happen. Besides, the animals mustn’t suffer another second. And the only way to do it is to annihilate their problem – the humans.

Humans will not wake up some day compassionate, caring, and moral.
Even if you believe they someday would, when you are waiting for that dreamlike day, you are actually saying to all the suffering creatures of the world and to the ones who haven’t even born yet - suffer quietly until the revolution. That’s insane!

The idea is not new for you we are sure. We know you all have already thought about it, it is truly very basic. But we have never heard that voice (in exception of the “declaration of war” by screaming wolf) and we understand that it is a very complicated mission that will be hard to actuate alone. So we felt that first of all we must try to expand the number of the attempters.

We hope that the solution will cause as little suffer as possible.
But remember that no matter what the method will be, it will probably cause suffer for one generation and then the suffer will be stopped for ever. So even if your idea has a potential of causing a lot of suffer there is no doubt that it is still worth it. Otherwise the suffer will never end.
Generation after generation will be born to this decayed world. Most of them only soon to be murdered for a steak, omelet, shoes, a coat, a hat, shampoo, pizza or just for fun.

If the only way to save someone from a life of constant misery, pain and suffer, is to kill the one who is responsible for that, and you decide not to do it because you are against violence and murder, you still just judged someone to a life full of violence and a murder in the end of them.
From the moment that you are aware of the possibility to stop someone’s suffer with violence and you refuse to use it, you actually support violence. In this world there is no non-violence approach. Non-violence direct actions are maybe not violent towards animal abusers but that is exactly why they are violent towards the abused animals. If you are not using violence to stop much more violence when it’s the only way, you actually support it.
Non-violent approach is not working. If you keep that dogma, you do it for yourselves. Not for the animals.

Hypothetically, If someday you incidentally see well known serial killer trying to kill a little child (no one is innocent, but a child is closer than most grownups) and if you have with you by chance a weapon (it is hypothetical remember), if you decide not to kill the serial killer – you actually kill the child. We don’t have the data so we couldn’t check it, but we are pretty sure that all the serial killers combined didn’t murder as much as one meat eater. Non violence is non moral. Violence is not an absolute bad. Only suffer is. If an action will eventually reduce the suffer amounts globally, it is a moral action, regardless of the fact that violence occurred. Hypothetically, if you met Hitler in the early forties would you explain to him that what he is doing is wrong or would you kill him if you could? Think about it.
We feel it is crucial to explain two important points. We are not suggesting killing non vegan humans. That won’t help. There are too much of them and too little of us. We are not after revenge either. We don’t hate humans. We hate suffer. And they cause it. In an incomprehensible figures. We were glad if we could saw another way but there isn’t. We never used violence against humans before. And we don’t intent to do it. At least not sporadically. The idea is to find the fastest, easiest, most simple and with as little suffer as possible - method to annihilate the human race. It is not anger. Not rage. But a rational solution to a very sad and mad world.

It might sounds like a too complicated project, but you probably don’t know that because you haven’t started yet. Maybe it is much simpler than it looks. Maybe some of you already have some of the knowledge that it takes. Maybe some of you have people they know that have access to information and substances that will be required. We still don’t have enough data to estimate the complication, if it is at all complicated. Maybe a brilliant scientist will be convinced and the method will come from there. Who knows? The intuition goes for a virus that act as quickly as possible and that is painless as possible. These kinds of viruses exist and there is a way to produce them and release them, we just have to figure out how.
We all have to start doing research and learn more about the potential possibilities. We intend to raise another website which will contain the data we will get, in the near future. We hope you will do so too. If we will change information, the chances will significantly rise. Of course we can’t contact through e-mails not to mention switch address, therefore a website is the only way.

You can characterize life in a lot of ways; one of them is that someone will always suffer for someone else.
The fact is that suffer is an inherent part of life. Like it or not, if you wish to stop the suffer, You have to stop life.
Unfortunately we feel that the fact that suffer is an integral part of life, won’t be a satisfying argument for almost all humans. Considering the amounts of suffer in the world and it doesn’t matter. There is no doubt that it has got to stop by all means.

The website consists of articles about many exploitation industries. Every animal there (including the human one) is a very good reason to do it.

You are all devoting your lives to reduce suffer. We did try too for a few years, but the thought that it is not the solution, that it is not enough, was always there.
We did demonstrations, rallies, parades, vegan food stands, information stands, lectures, workshops, direct actions, graffity, posters, flyers, liberations from factory farms and from laboratories, lobbyism and laws promotion, articles, investigations, TV advertisements, movies, blockings, street theatres and every other way we thought could help convince humans to stop take part and finance animal exploitation.
Of course we didn’t invent anything. Activists used all these methods and a lot more, for decades.

However the question whether or not the animal rights movement is succeeding is not relevant.
The arguments between the welfare advocates, the rights advocates and the abolitionists are not relevant. All of them are not efficient and not moral.
The reason is that all of them rely on human compassion and morality. History and every day reality prove it to be extremely inefficient. Humans will never voluntarily give up on their control over the non-human animals. Power is too addictive. The domination is too comfortable.

It doesn’t matter if society will someday cease to be sexist, chauvinist, fascist, so power based on and most important, will not be speciesist. We believe there is no chance that society will ever change. But that is not relevant either because we are not expecting you to follow the idea just because we believe there is no hope, even though it is absolutely obvious in this case. It doesn’t matter because it is not moral to “tell” the animals that they have to wait until people would understand. It is not moral to accept the current situation because we can’t stop humans from treating non-human animals as property, as means to their aims, and we can’t get rid of them either.
Well, we can. We can at least try. As a matter of fact we must try. It is the only moral way. Any other activities will doom the animals to a worse scenario than the current one. And you all know how horrible the current situation is.

Imagine a situation in which over 90% of the people in the world are crippled, who can't walk normally and suffer from constant pain for about half of their life time.
A global nightmare!
This is an every day reality for a population which is 8 times larger than the human one per year!
Our real world is much worse than the one you have just imagined.
The industry which makes meat out of little fragile chicks, and also refers as broiler chickens, is indubitable the extremist example of humans’ absolute and destructive domination on nonhuman animals. An ownership, which is found in every aspect of their miserable short lives.

We believe that what emphasize the speciesism and the alienation at most, is the farming regulation- 34 kilogram per meter. One sentence that unfortunately really describes the relationship between humans and non-human animals.

The only thing that could be worse than 50 billion crippled creatures who suffer like that is 100 billion crippled creatures who suffer like that 50 years from now.
The movement has no chance to stop it as long as it leans on human’s compassion. If you believe in it after all you have heard that humans do to animals, maybe some of the information on this website will wake you.

However, our primal and most important argument is that it doesn’t matter if things could change even in one year (nobody in his right mind believes that). It is not moral and very cruel to keep the animals in their cages until the revolution will come if it will come at all. That is what the movement has done so far. The organizations “decided” that no matter what the humans do, they must stay. They are trying to educate them and change their violent habits. It is useless and unmoral.

The question why 6 billion humans worth 100 billion non-human animals – birth to death suffer - every year is apparently not being asked. We simply don’t get it. Anyway they don’t!

It is pure speciesism to prefer the interests of one member of the species over others.
Practically there is a huge difference, but we don’t see a fundamental difference between meat eaters choosing their own interests over others than activists preferring their species interests over others. Like it or not, the facts are that humans are torturing and massacring non-human animals. It’s a war. One side is innocent and unarmed. the other is ruthless, vicious, greedy, and has the craziest weapons such as battery cages, ] veal crates, genetic manipulations, cleavers and scalpels. Whose side are you on?

The animal rights movement permits humans to adjudicate the fate of non-human animals. The animal rights movement actually, automatically accepts the general existence of suffer and compromise on the efforts to reduce it. Don’t get us wrong this is not exactly criticism. We understand you. Not long ago we acted the same way. It will be criticism if you’ll insist to keep act in the conventional way.

Peter Singer was recently quoted as saying that the agreement by McDonald's to give battery hens a few more inches of cage space was the most significant development for farm animals since he wrote Animal Liberation. Twenty-five years of welfarist reform and the best we can show is a larger battery cage. Welfare reforms have failed. And they shouldn’t have been started in the first place.
Animal’s lives are valuable as long and if they worthy in some way to humans. It all depends on what "function" they forced to apply in human’s lives. They are treated as little more than production machines. The animals produced for slaughter are the 'crop'. The aim is to eliminate everything that does not contribute to the final product, to turn them into machines for the conversion of feed into meat and other commodities. Welfare is doomed to failure because the short lives of farm animals are control by one principle – maximum production in minimum time and money. The meat industry considers the animal a profit-making item, whose death is merely part of the production process.
You don’t change unjust institutions by tiding them up. The laws and the welfare reforms, relieve the consciences of carnivores. Promoting “humane” exploitation is another proof that organizations, which all of them wish for abolition of course, understand that there is no chance for abolition. Otherwise why do they compromise on poor welfare laws? Besides, no product coming from domesticated animals can ever be cruelty free. Domestication is slavery in service to humans.

Humans seek to profit from the imprisonment and murder of those from the other species.
Humans seek to own and control the land, the oceans and the skies which should be free to all. We should stop them!

We hope you will think about it in a rational, open-minded way. Don’t automatically defend your efforts because we say they are almost useless (we used words until now and we admit it was efficiently and morally wrong). Look at the facts. Words are a waste of time. Laws are a waste of time. We wish they were not but there is no point complaining about it. No time too. The suffer isn’t waiting for us.

We are sure that many of you are encouraged by the liberation of the African slaves, because of some of the similarities between their struggle and the animal liberation struggle. Well, there are a lot of differences too. First and most important, the animals can’t fight against human’s tyranny by them selves, they need other humans to help them. The exploitation is unproportionately larger. The value of the victims is much lower. And all humans are the oppressors.
There is another difference between the African slaves liberation movement and the animal liberation movement. While no civil rights movement has been totally without the loss of lives, the level of carnage suffered by the animals is infinitely greater than anything experienced by humans. Thousands of people may die in their cause for liberty; but billions of animals are systematically, thoughtlessly, and brutally exterminated every year, which translates into millions each day! Animals are bred for slaughter, fed for slaughter, and led to slaughter. The level of oppression experienced by animals is greater, more pervasive, and longer in existence than any human oppression against other humans.

These are just part of the reasons why we think there is no reason to draw hopes from the slavery struggle. The main one is simple and very sad. Slavery has never ended.
"No-one shall be held in slavery and servitude", Says the universal declaration of human rights. However, there are more slaves in the world today than ever before.
This fact is generally not known. In part, this is because modern-day slavery does not fit our familiar images of shackles, whips, and auctions. Contemporary forms of human bondage include such practices as forced labor, servile marriage, debt bondage, child labor, and forced prostitution. Modern slaves can be concubines, shoes makers, or cane cutters. They might weave carpets; build roads, or clear forests. Though the vast majority is no longer sold at public auction, today's slaves are often no better off than their more familiar predecessors. Indeed, in many cases, their lives are more brutal and hazardous. Apartheid is not over either; it has changed to the world debt and the related “structural adjustment programs”.

Even if the day that humanity consider the interests of the weaker member of its own species and all the other species will some day come, Do you really believe that the billions of creatures that their lives are pain and suffer from birth to death should wait for that day?

What animals have done to deserve being imprisoned in cages, being infected with our diseases, and being carved up in our labs? No one would suggest that these animals "deserve" to be exploited and killed in slaughterhouses. We kill these innocent beings because we can, not because they deserve to die. We have the power to use weaker beings, so we do, following the assumption that might makes right.

What do you think that the animals would do?
They would escape from their captors. They would shoot back when being shot at. They would destroy the cages that confined them, so they could not be used again. They would damage roads that made way for the destructive force of automobiles. They would burn down research facilities, and kill animal researchers, who daily destroy their kin for profit and amusement. They would form an underground of saboteurs to disrupt the machinery of the vast human killing machine called society.
We believe that those with a wider spectrum would start a research which seek to stop the suffer for good. It might be very long and very frustrating but if they wish for a root and fundamental solution that’s the one. Annihilation of the abusive race.
Unfortunately the non-human animals can’t do it. You can. Don’t let them down.

Humans are capable of many morally unacceptable actions. White people were capable of enslaving black people. Men are capable of raping women. Non-elderly adults are capable of abusing both young and old alike.
Humans become the living graves of others, subjugating their most basic interests, that of life, to the most trivial tastes.
It would have been great if it was just about different opinions, but there are real victims, millions, billions, trillions. Innocent VICTIMS!

It seems that human’s moral rule is “do whatever you like as long as you can get away with it”.

Not anymore!

This is a call for the annihilation movement to rise.

Throughout our lives we are conditioned to accept speciesism. We grow up thinking that humans are more intelligent and therefore more important than other animals. We grow up in a society in which the murder of animals is legal (and therefore must be right). We are taught that animal products are good for us, and an essential part of the human diet. We are told that animals don’t suffer, or that their suffering is an unfortunate necessity.

Society is irrevocably speciesist and immoral. Gains made are easily reversed. Animal abuse will go on until mankind becomes extinct, or the planet is destroyed.
It’s time to open the eyes and admit that we shall never overcome.
History has shown that working within the cruel system and winning small battles for the animals will soon prove irrelevant. The carnage against animals continues. The opposition is stronger, better financed, and more numerous than animal defenders.

“Each to count for one and none for more than one.” Said Jeremy bantham.
On the other hand, the organizations are actually saying that one human count much more than one non-human if they morally object killing a human to save a non-human animal. An American meat eater is responsible for the abuse and killing of nearly 2,600 animals within his/her lifetime, including 2,460 chickens, 96 turkeys, 32 pigs and sheep, and 12 cattle/calves. Refusing to kill him means he worth the pain and the suffer of all of them. Don’t fool yourselves. It’s simple math. If he stays alive – all these animals won’t. The average British meat-eater is responsible for the abuse and deaths of approximately 760 chickens, 46 turkeys, 29 sheep, 20 pigs, 15 ducks, seven rabbits, five cows, one goose and more than 1,000 fish. Is he worth all their pain and suffer?

Violence is a way of life. Humans financially support violence every time they sit down to eat. When would humans realize that violence begins at breakfast?

Fixated conceptions that have been pervaded to our brains are preventing us from rational thinking. All our lives we hear that life is a superior value. Most people are not trying to challenge or criticize that conception. We were taught that no matter what we do, no matter what is the meaning of everything, no matter what is the quality of our lives, the most important thing is to live. Why we ask?

One of the most important beliefs which make animal abuse possible is the idea that humans and other animals are in some way separated by an unbridgeable gap.
But humans as you know are great apes not gods. Both genetically, and in terms of their behaviour, humans are much more closely related to other great apes than these animals are to monkeys. Humans and chimpanzees have about 98.4% of their genes in common, whereas monkeys have only about 93% of the same genes as the apes. Gorillas are about twice as close to humans genetically as they are to chimpanzees.
Compare this with the genetic difference between two similar birds such as the red-eyed vireo and the white-eyed vireo, which are 2.9% different genetically. In other words, these two very similar birds are twice as different genetically from each other as humans are from chimpanzees. The amazing similarity suppose to fundamentally weaken anthropocentric concepts that unfortunately most humans hold. Nothing fundamental has changed. Even those unequivocal facts are not convincing humans. They want to believe in their superiority because among other excuses it “justifies” their exploitation.

As insane as it to us, it is a desire for a particular taste sensation as justification for murder. Humans want to consume animal products.
A rational argument can’t overpower a motivation. It is beyond reason. They want to do what ever they want whenever they want. Ironically for most of them the law is the only limit. The same law that permits industrial cold-blood murder of billions every year. On morality, most humans spits.

Don’t give us the “if people just knew” and the “we should focus on exposing the facts”. People do know the facts. They know that meat is animal’s flesh. They know that animals born to die. They know meat is murder. They don’t care.
“Animal liberation” by peter singer was written almost 30 years ago. “Animals machines” by Ruth Harrison was written 40 years ago. They have many ways to get the information if they want to. They just don’t.

Linda McCarty was great and Paul is still great but they are also very wrong. For a lot of people the slaughterhouse walls are not opaque any more. Unfortunately it didn’t turn them to vegetarians. The slaughterhouses are on the streets, in restaurants and in the kitchen. All of us don’t really want to face it, but humans just don’t care.

We had thousands of conversations, we exposed the facts to thousands of people but only a very tiny fraction changed their habits in the end. Exposing the facts doesn’t convince most of the humans.

Humans prove again and again that their profits, taste preference, convenience, entertainment etc, is much more important for them than anything. Most of them are not even willing to hear the facts and listen to the arguments, not to mention to stop financing animal abuse.

You’ll never stop hearing the same stupid old responses:
What about how other animals kill and eat each other?
Human beings are a part of the food chain, and eating meat is natural. So then, how can it be wrong?
Doesn't the Bible say that humans have dominion over the animals?
If God did not want us to eat meat, then why did he place animals on the Earth?
How do you know that plants can not feel pain?
What about insects?
Would you rather save your child or your dog?
Shouldn't we focus on solving human problems before worrying about animals?
If everyone becomes a vegetarian, then what will we do with all the farm animals?
Meat tastes too good to become a vegetarian.
If we didn't raise animals for food, then they would never have had the chance to be born and experience life at all.
Don’t you have something better to do?
And you will give the same answers.
For how long will you play this game? It is a waste of energy and time.
The animals don’t have either of them.

Humans have a tremendous capability to close their mind from all reasoning and insulate themselves from moral arguments. We understand it but we mustn’t morally accept it. We are not directly accusing humans for what they are. Maybe it is not their fault that they are what they are. We are not in to accusations. We are in to solutions.
So even if part of humans are some sort of victims too, still if you think in a global way and not in an anthropocentric and a speciesist way, annihilation is not just the only way to solve all the world’s suffer – it is the only moral way to act against suffer at all. Every other way is immoral.

Wake up! A world which a battery cage could have been invented in, is a world that unlegislated them won’t cure anything. The world is too sick, and life itself is the disease. Battery cages are a symptom. One of the severest, but still a symptom. Even a vegan world (with no doubt a dream come true for all of us) is not enough. Twisted minds that invented something like a battery cage should be eliminated. Otherwise they might do it again. We are used to all those factory farming devices, but if you stop and think about it, it is pure wickedness.

We feel ridicules trying to convince you that there will never be a vegan world. Wake up! Bullfights still exist and still very popular.
For too many humans, non-humans’ pain and suffer means nothing.
How can they dare comparing a bull's life to their brutal and repulsive tradition? However, they do. It is a fact! Nothing helps to stop it. Years by years of many campaigns. You know what will

To convince someone to go vegan as an attempt to save the world, is similar to an attempt to save a sinking ship by tossing out water with a teaspoon.
The only way to stop the symptoms of the problem is to identify the main root cause and directly work to abolish it.

The suffer cause is inevitable. Even for animal rights activists. All who participate in this system are up to their necks in the blood of innocent creatures. Even the most avid animal lover is guilty of murder by participating in an evil, destructive system.
paying for animal research in medicine and the military, the predator control program, subsidies to the logging industry, price supports to grain farmers, the maintenance of public lands used by hunters, the building and maintenance of highways, the defense of oil industry investments, and many more animal abuses with their tax.

While we are asking our selves when “artificial insemination” will be considered as what it is - a rape! And when a slaughter will be considered as what it is - a murder! Humans seize rodeo, circuses and angling as sport and entertainment, a fox as coat, a horse as transportation.
The only scarier thing than a review of what humans did so far is what they can do in the future.

The exploitation is so conventional, so obvious that the blood in the steak becomes a sauce. Even when the "food" has a face like fish, humans find a way to alienate them selves from the pain and suffer. They invented a myth that fish can’t feel pain. There is no rational and moral thinking. Only fixated and deficient concepts. Fish are not less capable of suffering then a dog, a cat or a human. Humans however, prefer to believe, against all biological and anatomical facts that fish can't feel pain. What a convenient excuse for humans to treat fish as commodities. The relation towards them is so disgraceful, so speciesist that they are not even counted in fish numbers but in kilograms and tons.
As a matter of fact they don’t really need excuses. They don’t argue that chickens, cows, sheep and pigs feel pain, but it doesn’t bother them while they kick them, burn them, stab them, debeak them, drown them, step on them, imprison them, dry them, cut them, detoe them, dehorn them, beat them, starve them, ride them, punch them, sear them… and finally murder them.

It seems that humans would do every possible mistake and would take any immoral decision.
As regard to fish, they torture them for fun. Prison them for ornament. Build walkways, hotels, restaurants, private beaches and marinas while destroying natural coastline and restricting their habitats. They invade to their homes with ships, which are distressing noise pollution, chemical pollution, oil pollution and space pollution. Humans also disregard their fellow race needs and rights including, of course their own, by turning every river, lake and ocean in to a waste dump.
The home of trillions of creatures has become the world's dumping grounds.
When consuming fish, humans actually eat from their excretion. The poor fish are picking up all kinds of pollutions into their bodies. The humans who eat fish don’t pay the price, laboratory animals do! In order to cure humans diseases which as always, caused by their own fault and irresponsibility, more animals are being tortured, this time in laboratories.

The essence of wrong-doing is to allow our own minor interests to override the major Interests of others. Humans make the entire lives of animals miserable solely in order to enjoy a meal.
What is religious, sacred, heavenly, or celestial about the murder of a defenseless, fully sentient bird? Thanksgiving (Deathgiving is more suitable) is a holocaust for turkeys.
To which god do we sacrifice these birds each year? Perhaps to the god of agriculture and finance.

The state system is not going to allow any real change within it, unless the state structure (government), big business, and finally the mainstream consumer society feels that change is really necessary. Yet, it is the same state structure, big business, and consumer society that is directly responsible for the destruction of life on the planet for the sake of profit. When these entities have repeatedly demonstrated their prioritizing of monetary gain ahead of life, it is absolute foolishness to continue to ask them nicely for reform or revolution.

History is not something that happens to people—it is the activity of people. In every moment, in every decision and gesture, we make our culture, our life stories, and our world.
The website is full of what humans have accomplished so far.
Here is an example. One confession from a slaughterhouse worker:
"One time, I took my knife--it's sharp enough--and I sliced off the end of a hog's nose, just like a piece of lunch meat. The hog went crazy for a few seconds. Then it just sat there looking kind of stupid. So I took a handful of salt brine and ground it into his nose. Now that hog really went nuts, pushing its nose all over the place. I still had a bunch of salt left on my hand and I stuck the salt right up the hog's ass. The poor hog didn't know whether to shit or go blind".

Do you really want them to continue?

You are really naive if you believe that this pure wickedness is rare. Something like that is happening right now! And every minute of every hour of every 365 days in every horrible year. It never stops! You want to convince someone like that, that animals are moral beings too? That they have rights too? That they feel pain? They know. They see it every day. They smell it every minute. They hear it every second. They don’t care.

How can you tell them to wait until humans will change?! Do you really believe that humans worth all the world’s creatures suffer?

Pigs, as example, are products of animal concentration camps. Every day you waste on trying to convince people to stop doing so, you are morally responsible for those concentration camps existence.

Don’t automatically defend yourself, think about it! There is only one solution!

Humans don’t see themselves as part of nature anymore, they are mere parasites living of it. Yet every place that we have infested in we have left our destructive footprints.

However one of the most common excuses that people chose to hold to, convincing themselves that it’s o.k. to exploit animals, mainly regarding to eating meat, is that it is natural. It is much easier for them to live with themselves, after they decided that it is o.k. for humans to use animals, regardless of their horrible everyday reality.
They don’t look for the truth but a superficial excuse to hold on to. No matter how ridicules it is, how inconsecutive it is, they don’t care as long as they got something to say when they are asked about meat eating.

Simple biology facts are off hand canceled when they don’t feet with their wishes and convenience habits.
Human’s extreme alienation from nature is been forgotten when they are hungry or feel like buying new shoes. Then all of a sudden every human is a natural born hunter.

How can humans not be aware of this absurd argument? Especially when they claim it while being in an elevator or their car! With an air conditioner! With a stereo system! With cloths on of course, sunglass and a cell phone! Very “natural” indeed.

There is a very little chance to convince such a fixated, low self aware, narrow minded, apathetic, irrational, selfish creature to even listen and maintain a rational conversation. Convincing someone to entirely change his lifestyle is very very rare.

If you still act in a conventional ways, you are actually saying to the dairy cows and the laying hens to wait for the revolution. Tell the 45 billion crippled broiler chickens “there is nothing to do… it is a process you see…..”. How convenient that we don’t have to face them.
Their suffer is in the hands of selfish and greedy humans. Very unreliable hands. Get their fate out of humans’ hands. Elimination is the only way to free the world from their tyranny. Working with humans, hopping they’ll voluntarily give up their total control position, their god status, is stupidly naïve and morally dangerous.
We must tear the domination from them by all means. And you know what that means.

If you object the idea because life has its good parts too, we suggest you to get out from your point of view and think of one spermatozoon that will randomly meet any egg. What are the chances of the born baby to be happy?
Most humans think about life and about happiness from a human perspective only.
Well the chances of the one spermatozoon to be a happy human are not so good.
50% it will be a woman. Of course it doesn’t mean she can’t be happy, but it means she will be automatically and systematically discriminated for all her life just because her gender. There are 25% chance that a female will experience some sort of sexual abuse. It has more than 50% chances to be very poor.
The spermatozoon has 20% chance to live with a lack of safe drinking water and 30% to live without water for basic hygiene. 18% it will suffer from hunger. 30% it will be anemic. 25% it will live in dangerous, unstable situations 20% it will be illiterate. 30% it will be in a constant risk to get malaria. 40% are at risk from dengue.
The list never really ends. There are so many suffering causes and that is when the spermatozoon turned to be the best protected animal. Humans live like kings compare to non-human animals. Things get significantly worse when we calculate the spermatozoon chances to be happy if it turns to be any creature in the world. The spermatozoon has 8 times more chances to be a farm animal than to be a human. Think about it.

If humans were raised in factory farms would you be satisfy with demonstrations and letter writing? If it was your family that was hunted for someone’s amusement what would you do? What if your little brother or sister was being raped every day? Would you have a peaceful talk with the rapists? Would you beg a newspaper editor, who is a rapist himself, to put a story about it? Write to a congressman who is a rapist and a legislator of institutional rapes himself? You are not doing right if you are not using violence to stop it. Non violence is not relevant in this world in this struggle. Pacifism is a beautiful value, but not moral. It might help you to feel more complete with yourselves. But it also helps the abusers to keep abusing.

We didn’t give any information about our selves in the first email, but still some organizations replayed - “if it is involved with hurting humans leave us out”.
We only wrote that our manifest is about the only one solution. We didn’t write what it is. Of course it is obvious and of course some organizations figured that out. Don’t you think its means something? What exactly those organizations said? That they know that it is the only one solution (otherwise how did they guess) but they are not interested in helping?!

The last thing we want to do is cause despair among the few people who devote their lives to make a better world. We want you to understand that the best world is a one without humans.

Justice won’t come just because the animal liberation movement has good arguments. The animal liberation ideology is so simple and right that theoretically it doesn’t need help from ecology and health. But in reality even they can’t help.
There is a reason why the organizations always using the “for the environment, for the hungry and for you” argument. You know it is very difficult to convince someone to go vegan for moral reasons, so a lot of you add these arguments. The same is with vivisection. Stop animal experiments - they are scientific unreliable.
Arguments based solely on self-interest are harmful insofar as they suggest that it's morally acceptable to harm non-humans if harming them benefits us. When it stands alone, the health argument for veganism implies that it would be fine to eat flesh and other animal-derived foods if doing so was healthful. By itself, the scientific argument against vivisection implies that it would be fine to vivisect if vivisection was a great science.
You didn’t start your activity because you were worried about human’s health.
So why do the organizations use it? It’s a strategic method of course, but why is it necessary?
Because humans won’t change their violent habits for moral reasons. And you know it! Explanations are useless and immoral (while you explain they suffer). Every minute is like eternal suffer for billions of innocents. Please don’t give up on the possibility to save them from a life of suffer.

The situation is too horrible for campaign games. Leave your egos aside. It is not about you. If you reject the idea, you are actually saying that the animals would have to wait until all the world’s humans are convinced.

There is a reason why organizations are afraid to push too far on humans. Humans have a very narrow tolerance for change. If they are pushed too far they will rebel and go the opposite direction. You already know there is very little to work with. A very small minority that do care, and which is not totally hopeless. What about the vast Marjory? Do they have a permission to abuse animals?
Aiming only to the - tiny not totally hopeless moral group – is letting the enormous majority to be morally free. No way!

Feminist ideology is supposed to be completely against supremacy and hierarchy and really in harmony with non-oppression and non-violence.
Is feminism against violence to the helpless or just violence to women? Are they opposed to exploitation in principle, or just the exploitation of women? Inherent in feminist ideology is the basic philosophy of freedom from oppression for all living beings. Sadly, however, many feminists are still "human chauvenists".
Women are urging men to give up power, yet women don’t give up their power over other creatures.
Women can't understand why it is taking them so long! How long will it take women to relinquish their power over others? How long will some feminists go on munching on the greasy bones of little murdered birds? Dressing in the skins of slaughtered cows and wild creatures? How long will they tolerate a state that sanctions commercial savagery? How long will they feel comfortable with non-human animals suffering? Many feminists sit down to steak dinners like the macho men who hurl insults at them on the street--and they uphold the same supremacist ideas about animals. How many feminists realize (or want to realize) the amount of violence, oppression, and suffering they support at the meat counter, the dairy case, the leather goods store, the fur shop, and the cosmetics counter? Unfortunately even those who supposed to be our affinity groups are actually part of the abusing group.

Environmentalists are not much different. They don’t protect the environment because it is the animals’ homes but out of selfish means. They enjoy the tall trees, clean air, and clean rivers and lakes. They value the way nature makes them feel. They believe in saving a forest, because they like to hike in them. They plead for saving a particular river, because they like to fish in it. They cry for saving the rainforests, because their planet depends on it.
There is no other way to explain environmentalists that consume animal products, which are the number one cause of environmental damages, than selfishness, hypocrisy and anthropocentrism. Environmentalists protect the environment for themselves!
It is absurd to hear from environmentalists that it is natural to eat meat. Sadly, we hear it all the time. All they care about is their little green place.
The facts are not debatable. Factory farming is an environmental death execution, What makes many environmentalists the environment executers.

Most humans haven’t even made the most basic ethical decision – not to eat animal’s flesh. It looks impossible to educate humans to do simple things like recycle or not being racist or sexist, so there is no way convincing them all to become vegan. And being vegan is not enough.
It is not that they have to do something unusual or difficult, only to replace some of the ingredients in their food to some others. You know the facts. So many good reasons including egocentric ones to go vegan, but humans insist on systematically torture non-human animals, spiting in the faces of the world’s billion hungry people, harm their own health and bequeath their children a destroyed planet.
We find meat eating as the most classical characteristic of human nature. Apathetic, impulsive, careless, selfish, narrow minded, without the slightest thought about the future consequences.

The holiness of human’s life is so absurd. While humans argue whether birth limitation is moral or not, they justify cold-blood murder of non-human animals by claiming that they are damaging the environment. Humans are unproportionately more destructive to the environment than all the non-humans combined. Nothing is even close to the destructive ability of the human race. There are no justifications. The human race is the world’s biggest pest. Annihilate it.

Nature is not "right".
For many people Nature represents perfection, something ideal from which we should learn, or something spiritual that we should worship, something that ought to be preserved and with which we should never tamper.
The history of the evolution of life on this planet has been written with pain and blood. Survival and reproduction have been the only imperatives guiding the gradual changes in morphology which have given the various species their present forms.
Not criticism just mechanism. But we have a chance to change that. Why should we not change the rules of natural selection? It doesn’t have to be like that. Moral people do not stand idly by while helpless animals suffer needlessly. We can change it.

Most people, however, have their perspectives molded for them by the society in which they live. The overwhelming majority of us see the world and ourselves in ways conditioned into us by the institutions that run our lives, government, family, marriage, church, corporations, school, etc. Each of these institutions, in turn, is generally a part of what is called the Establishment—an entity which exists solely for the perpetuation of the power of a relative minority. Fueled by that elite's passion for more and more power, the Establishment necessarily draws power from the rest of the world by way of oppression. The Establishment employs many forms of oppression; most of them commonly acknowledged but rarely understood, much less opposed. First, there is classism, which is economic oppression; statism, or the subjugation of people by political authority; sexism and homosexism, oppression based on heterosexual (male) supremacy or patriarchy; and racism, a general term for oppressions founded in ethnocentrism. There is ageism, the dominance of adults over children and young people; and, finally, the biggest oppression ever. Oppression which results from anthropocentrism, namely speciesism.
All of the above have yet disappeared from our world. speciesism is the hardest one to get rid of. It will take ages if ever. It is not moral to wait. Join the “only one solution”.

We live in a world in which even most humans, which, without a justified reason, morally superior over nonhuman animals, do not have basic control over what happens with their lives.
What hope then do nonhumans have? If in the third millennium, half of the human population is systematically and automatically discriminated just because of their gender.
Such contempt towards women in the third millennium, simply do not leave a room for hope for the non-human animals to ever be liberated!

Human’s priorities among their own species are scary. They leave no hope for the non-humans. It is estimated that $50 billion per year are required to provide universal access to clean drinking water and sanitation. Currently one fifth is spend each year on water systems which is at least quantity speaking the humans biggest problem. In Europe $11 billion is spent each year on ice cream. $105 billion is spent annually on alcoholic drinks, twice the amount required to ensure water, sanitation and hygiene for all.
It would cost each citizen of the richest countries $1.70 per person per year to cancel the remaining debts of all African countries which have qualified for debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative.
It would cost each citizen of the richest countries ten dollars per year to fully finance the struggle against HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria in developing countries.
Another ten dollars from each citizen of the richest countries per year would provide basic education and primary health care to twenty of the poorest countries in Africa. World military spending on the other hand are more than a trillion dollars per year.

The human race has never succeeded in managing with himself, not to mention the whole world. Ironically, if the world was a corporation, by human rules, it would have been fired long ago.
How many more chances would the human race get? And why? What good has he done to deserve it? He fails again and again, with unbearable, destructive consequence, however he is not "fired"!
Can't you see it doesn’t have to be like this?! The human race doesn’t have to exist. On the contrary, it is got to be eliminated forever. Fire the human race!

There is enough for everybody but still the gaps between poor and rich are extremely widening. Half the world's people live on less than $2 a day. 1.2 billion People live on less than $1 per day.450 richest people in the world have hold assets exceeding the combined annual incomes of countries with half of the world's population.

Human’s ignorance and conservatism during the first years of the AIDS outbreak, were some of the catalyst elements that caused it to grow to today’s measures. Racism and Homophobia were the main reasons. It was called the “gay disease”. It was thought that only gay men from san-Francisco could get it. Westerns claimed that Africans had sex (raped is the real word to call it) with monkeys and that was the source.
Those prejudices prevent early diagnoses that could have been help the humans. No one bothered to deal with the disease because it was African and gay disease. The humans that got the virus were abused, fired, and kicked out from school.
Twenty years ago the mysterious disease was deciphered but still the U.N Islamic representatives refuse to participate in AIDS conventions. Do you want non-human animals’ lives in their hands?! No way.

There is always a war going on somewhere in the world. One subsides, another breaks out. Since the 1950s, more wars have started than have stopped. Between 1945 and 1992, there were 149 major wars. More than three new wars a year.

Approximately 540 million children in the world, one in four, live in dangerous, unstable situations.
More than half of the children living in conflicts zones, witnessed a murder. Half were held in a position, which they thought they were going to die.
However, the most dangerous arena for children is the one place that supposed to be the safest, their own home.
Humans have failed in ensuring that children enjoy access to education and health services and protection for their lives. That is with their own children!
It seems that humans cannot do anything right.
All these children are the victims of today and the abusers of tomorrow. They were raised in a violent environment by violent parents. Every child is exposed to violence on a daily basis.
All their lives they learned that power will get them what they want, and they are allowed to use it at any time they like, especially on who is weaker. The next generation will not be different.

Men are bombarded with violence on a daily basis. Television, movies and advertising continue to glorify the role of the "macho" man through action movies and television, violent video games and toys, pornography and much more.
Just as traditional notions of femininity have influenced both the way women behave, and the way they are expected to behave, men are victims of similar expectations, to be controlling, aggressive, physically strong, heterosexual, courageous and a financial provider.
From the earliest age, boys learn how to “be a man” from their fathers, mothers, teachers, mentors, friends and other role models including the ones they find on television and in movies. Boys play with guns, planes and other violent toys, they engage in “contact sports” that glorify violence and the ability to overcome the other team, they are expected to become ruthless and powerful business executives, destroying their competitors, or they are encouraged to join the military and serve their countries by attacking “enemy” states or groups of people.

Don’t expect the movies industry, the television industry, the toys industry or advertising companies to care and change their actions because of their part in gender-based violence or the image of women in society. They won't. It is not profitable to care.
The world doesn’t entitle with more and more opportunities. Destroy it!

As you can see and already know, the world is a horrible place for humans too.
More than billion people experience the gnawing pain of perpetual hunger.
Each year 40 million people die from hunger and hunger-related diseases.
About 24,000 people die from the effects of hunger each day. Not each week, but each day! That's about one person every 3.5 seconds.

The purpose of these death figures is of course to emphasis the human race apathy to his members. Most of them don’t agree with us that death is not necessarily a bad thing. It depends on the suffer amounts that have been increased or decreased. Death doesn’t stand for his own but only if it affects the surroundings, no matter who or where they are.

Like any other action, death is a bad thing when it cause an increase in the global suffer amount or a good thing when it reduces it. When a meat eater vivisectionist dies it will probably reduce global suffer, so it is a good thing. When a vegan animal rights activist dies it will probably increase the global suffer balance - therefore a bad thing. So take a good care of yourselves.
Obviously, in many situations it is not as simple as it sounds. It is not always that clear what action will reduce more suffer than increasing it.
Accept of course the action that will reduce the suffer by 99%, annihilation of the human race.

However, from most of human's point of view, hunger, water shortage, cholera, AIDS, malaria etc, are seized as absolute bad things. Still, humans, particularly westerns, are actually killing third world people.
We assume that most of those westerns (probably almost all of them) will vigorously opposed to the only one solution idea, Even though they are directly responsible to the murders of billions every year (non-human animals and human animals), for completely different reasons. Not out of compassion, rational and moral concepts of how to eliminate the world suffer, but out of cupidity, stupidity, ostentation, gluttony, dandyism, ignorant, cheep entertainment, fun and plain cruelty.

Why are you accepting this cruel, full of suffer world? Life is not inevitable.
Why should all the world's, so called, weaker layers of society wait till the values of the world reverse? Why should they wait until life become prior to profits? Add the historically and logically based assumption that this desirable order of priorities will never happen and it couldn’t get more obvious than that.

Humans are so indifferent to the fate of others. What doesn’t directly affect them doesn’t worth any attention. Observe the forecast and situation:
Water covers about two-thirds of the earth's surface, admittedly, but most is too salty for use. Only 2.5% of the world’s water is not salty, and two-thirds of that is lacked up in the icecaps and glaciers.
Of what is left, about 20% is in remote areas, and much of the rest arrives at the wrong time and place, as monsoons and floods.
Humans have less than 0.08% of all the earth's water available for their use. Yet, over the next two decades our use is estimated to increase by about 40%. Do you think that if they'll hear this estimation, they stop fill their private pools? Stop taking a long bubble bat? Stop being repulsive egoists? Forget it!

That is the way they treat their own species, their own race, their own nation, their own family, them selves. Do you really believe they someday will treat animals morally, when they don’t even see themselves as animals but as superior creatures? As long as the world is relentlessly capitalist?

You know Capitalism’s “golden rule” “whoever has the gold makes the rules”.
Though animals don’t even know what money is, they are the poorest creatures in the world.

Why should all the suffering creatures wait for you to figure out how to change those priorities? Stop trying to change the priorities, it’s useless! Start thinking how to get rid of the decision makers.

We worship those of you who give up on their personal lives to help the animals, dedicating every minute and thought to figure out a way to be effective.
Risking your personal security to help the animals. We did it too.
We left our organizations, all the activity we did, and we left our friends and everything else and started this new campaign. The only campaign that we ever believed in. Unfortunately we kept working in the conventional movement until now. We have no excuses. We did wrong. But not anymore.
We won’t quit until we find a way to annihilate the human race or find that there is no way. But….There is no way that there is no way.